One of the great things about living in Africa is learning
about places that I knew very little about before. Rishi and I recently
returned from a trip to Madagascar and in March, we visited Mauritius. These
two island nations are well off the radar of most Americans, who may associate
Madagascar with a DreamWorks animated film, or perhaps with rainforests and
lemurs. As for Mauritius, I confess to knowing virtually nothing about it
before planning our trip there. In two separate blogs on Mauritius and Madagascar, I've written about our experience as travelers, but in this entry, I'm taking a closer look at the history, culture, and economies of the two countries.
Madagascar has 287 times the land area of its Indian Ocean neighbor Mauritius, which is at the far eastern edge of this map. Oh, see that other nearby island, Réunion? That’s the overseas department of France that made headlines recently when wreckage from Malaysian Airlines flight 370 was found ashore.
During the breakup of Gondwanaland, Madagascar split off
from Africa about 160 million years ago, and subsequently from the Indian
subcontinent about 88 million years ago. Its long-term isolation led to a high
rate of endemic species, estimated at about 90% across animals and plants combined.
A few of Madagascar's endemic species, clockwise from upper left: diademed sifaka lemur, crested drongo, traveler's palm (not a true palm but actually a member of bird of paradise family), comet moth, amber mountain rock thrush, and Sanford's brown lemur.
Human habitation of Madagascar is traced to the arrival by boat of people from Indonesia starting around 350 BC, followed by Bantu peoples arriving from across the Mozambique Channel about 1000 AD. It was ruled by local kings until a central monarchy, called the Merina, united the country in the 19th century. Following the collapse of the Merina monarchy in 1897, Madagascar was a French colony until 1960 when it gained its independence. Official languages are Malagasy, which has Malayo-Polynesian roots, and French. English is not commonly spoken.
Hindu temples are everywhere in Mauritius, due to the large number of Indians
who came there as indentured servants during the British colonial period.
Mauritius has no official language, though government
business is conducted in English and road signs are in English as well.
However, among themselves, Mauritians are more likely to speak a French-based
Mauritian Creole, and various Indian languages are commonly spoken as well. Rishi
and I found that when English wasn’t working, I could communicate with people
in French, and sometimes he could use Hindi.
Since becoming an independent country in 1968, Mauritius has
benefitted from a stable democratic government. The 2015 Ibrahim Index of
African Governance ranks Mauritius first overall among 54 African nations.[i]
In Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index, 2014, Mauritius
garners a score of 54, well above the worldwide average score of 43. [ii]
This ranks Mauritius as the 47th least corrupt county, tied with
Costa Rica and Hungary. Mauritius is relatively prosperous as well, having
transitioned from an agricultural low-income country to a more diversified
economy, though sugar is still an important component. Tourism is huge, with
lots of visitors from South Africa; Europe, especially France and Germany; and
China. It seems like nearly every attractive beach has been given over to large
resort hotels. Other major industries include textiles and financial services. Per
the World Bank, gross national income (GNI) per capita in 2014 was $9,710,
putting Mauritius solidly into the upper middle income category. [iii], [iv]
Madagascar, alas, is another story. The country is really
poor. Per the World Bank, gross national income per capita in 2014 was $440,
making it one of the ten poorest countries in the world. No doubt, an unstable
government and corruption aren’t helping. Since gaining independence, it has
experienced four republics (basically over turnings of the government,
including one assassination), each with a new constitution. More recently, a
coup in 2009 resulted in an interim government that was not considered
legitimate. As a result, Madagascar lost foreign investment and donor funding,
and the nascent tourism industry was set way back as well. The country has
since returned to a democratically elected government, with a new president and
National Assembly elected in 2013. But major infrastructure, such as roads and
water systems are severely lacking, another factor hindering tourism as well as agricultural exports industry. Only 51%
of the population has access to improved water
systems and only 12% to improved sanitation facilities. Nearly everyone with
spoke with lamented that corruption is rampant. Indeed, Transparency International’s
ranking puts Madagascar at 133 of 174 nations, right beside Nicaragua. It
scores 49.1 (29th out of 54) in the Ibrahim Index.
Compounding Madagascar’s problems is its rapid population
growth. While traveling through the country, one can’t help but notice how so
many young women, girls really, have a child at the hip or on the back. This is
a country where the babies are having babies. The fertility rate (births/woman)
is 4.5, so population growth is huge.
Bringing this all back around to the subject of travel,
having returned from these two countries, I’ve been mulling over the question
of whether I’d like to return to either of them for further travels. When it comes
to Mauritius, I feel that the cliché “been there, done that” applies. It's actually a bit overdeveloped for my taste. Madagascar, on the other hand, was very diverse and interesting, despite the
challenges of traveling there. Though it’s very poor, tourism is no doubt one
of the keys to developing the Madagascar economy and supporting the
preservation of its unique ecosystems. So perhaps I will go there again.
[iii] http://data.worldbank.org/topic/economy-and-growth#tp_wdi. Also used for other data on income, fertility, access to infrastructure, and other data for both countries.
[iv] http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-and-lending-groups: For the current 2016 fiscal year,
low-income economies are defined as those with a GNI per capita, calculated
using the World Bank Atlas
method, of $1,045 or less
in 2014; middle-income economies are those with a GNI per capita of more than
$1,045 but less than $12,736; high-income economies are those with a GNI per
capita of $12,736 or more. Lower-middle-income and upper-middle-income
economies are separated at a GNI per capita of $4,125.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment